Search for: All records

With increasingly deployed cameras and the rapid advances of Computer Vision, large-scale live video analytics becomes feasible. However, analyzing videos is compute-intensive. In addition, live video analytics needs to be performed in real time. In this paper, we design an edge server system for live video analytics. We propose to perform configuration adaptation without profiling video online. We select configurations with a prediction model based on object movement features. In addition, we reduce the latency through resource orchestration on video analytics servers. The key idea of resource orchestration is to batch inference tasks that use the same CNN model, and schedule tasks based on a priority value that estimates their impact on the total latency. We evaluate our system with two video analytic applications, road traffic monitoring and pose detection. The experimental results show that our profiling-free adaptation reduces the workload by 80% of the state-of-the-art adaptation without lowering the accuracy. The average serving latency is reduced by up to 95% comparing with the profiling-based adaptation. 

Video analytics has many applications in traffic control, security monitoring, action/event analysis, etc. With the adoption of deep neural networks, the accuracy of video analytics in video streams has been greatly improved. However, deep neural networks for performing video analytics are compute-intensive. In order to reduce processing time, many systems switch to the lower frame rate or resolution. State-of-the-art switching approaches adjust configurations by profiling video clips on a large configuration space. Multiple configurations are tested periodically and the cheapest one with a desired accuracy is adopted. In this paper, we propose a method that adapts the configuration by analyzing past video analytics results instead of profiling candidate configurations. Our method adopts a lower/higher resolution or frame rate when objects move slow/fast. We train a model that automatically selects the best configuration. We evaluate our method with two real-world video analytics applications: traffic tracking and pose estimation. Compared to the periodic profiling method, our method achieves 3%-12% higher accuracy with the same resource cost and 8-17x faster with comparable accuracy.